Breivik ist nicht "wirr"

Bei diesem Beitrag handelt es sich um ein Blog aus der Freitag-Community

Als ich bereits Freitag Nacht darauf hinwies, dass der Täter von Oslo die Jugendlichen erschoss, weil er damit eine politische Strategie verfolgte, nämlich die vermeintliche Ursache für eine "Islamisierung" durch einen Angriff auf den "Kulturmarxismus" und insbesondere auf die linke Jugend, die "Stoltenberg Jugend" zu stoppen, wurde mir in meinem Blog "Pietätlosigkeit" vorgeworfen. In den Medien ist jetzt zu hören, dass Breivik ein "wirres" Geständnis abgelegt habe. Liest man seine Kommentare in document.no oder sein "2083 - A European Declaration of Independence", so zeigt sich, dass Breivik alles andere als "wirr" ist. Der Massenmord war genau geplant, er dient als Aufakt einer konservativen Revolution. Breivik hat bewusst in Kauf genommen, verhaftet zu werden. Der Massenmord ist eine PR-Aktion für sein Pamphlet. Er wird in den entsprechenden Neonazi-Kreisen nicht verurteilt werden, sondern als Märtyrer abgefeiert werden. Seine Analyse der bestehenden Gesellschaft ist in bestimmten Kreisen Mainstream. Sie richtet sich gegen

  • Kritische Theorie
  • Feminismus
  • "Political Correctnes"
  • Multikulturalismus
  • "Islamisierung"

Diese Position findet sich auf breit frequentierten Blogs wie "Political Incorrect". Nur die Praxis unterscheidet sich. Hier eine Zusammenfassung des ersten Kapitels von 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence:

"Conclusions

Critical Theory as applied mass psychology has led to the deconstruction of gender in the European culture. Following Critical Theory, the distinction between masculinity and femininity will disappear. The traditional roles of the mothers and fathers are to be dissolved so that patriarchy will be ended. Children are not to be raised according to their biological genders and gender roles according to their biological differences. This reflects the Frankfurt School rationale for the disintegration of the traditional family.

Thus, one of the basic tenets of Critical Theory was the necessity to break down the traditional family. The Frankfurt School scholars preached:

Even a partial breakdown of parental authority in the family might tend to increase the readiness of a coming generation to accept social change.

The transformation of European culture envisioned by the cultural Marxists goes further than pursuing gender equality. Embodied in their agenda is “matriarchal theory,” under which they purpose to transform European culture to be female-dominated. This is a direct throwback to Wilhelm Reich, a Frankfurt School member who considered matriarchal theory in psychoanalytic terms. In 1933, he wrote in “The Mass Psychology of Fascism” that matriarchy was the only genuine family type of “natural society.”

Richard Bernstein has written in his book on multiculturalism, “the Marxist revolutionary process for the past several decades in Europe and America has centered on race and sex warfare rather than class warfare” as in earlier times. This reflects a scheme more total than economics to restructure the society. As the social revolutionaries readily proclaim, their purpose is to destroy the hegemony of white males. To accomplish this, all barriers to the introduction of more women and minorities throughout the “power structure” are to be brought down by all means available. Laws and lawsuits, intimidation, and demonising of white males as racists and sexists are pursued through the mass media and the universities. The psycho–dynamic of the revolutionary process aims for psychic disempowerment – decapitation – of those who oppose.

The US’s founders recognised three primal values in the Declaration of Independence, and they ranked them properly: Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

If the order of these fundamental human rights is switched – with happiness before liberty or liberty before life – we come to moral chaos and social anarchy.

This very condition is what Judge Robert Bork describes as “modern liberalism.” He defines its characteristics as “‘radical egalitarianism’ (equality of outcomes rather than of opportunities) and ‘radical individualism’ (the drastic reduction of limits to personal gratification).”

Judge Bork also identifies radical feminism as “the most destructive and fanatical” element of this modern liberalism. He further describes radical feminism as “totalitarian in spirit.”

Most Western Europeans and Americans do not realise that they, through their institutions, are being led by social revolutionaries who think in terms of the continuing destruction of the existing social order in order to create a new one. The revolutionaries are New Age Elite Boomers. They now control the public institutions in Western Europe and the United States. Their “quiet” revolution, beginning with the counterculture revolution of their youth, is nearing completion. A key, or even a dominant element because purportedly it represents that largest political and social constituency among their potential followers, is feminism. The Marxist movement in its “quiet” cultural latter-day phase is seemingly sweeping all before it. With its sway over the media, fully in the grip of feminism, it is hard to discern the stirrings of a counter-culture. The current cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites, the New Totalitarians, are the most dangerous generation in Western history. Not only have they managed to destroy fundamental structures of European society. They are allowing millions of Muslims to colonise Europe.

In just five decades Muslim populations have increased from a few thousand to more than 25 million.

Who will rise to challenge Political Correctness? The fate of European civilisation depends on European men steadfastly resisting Politically Correct feminism. Even more, they must resourcefully oppose the wider grip of Political Correctness, the cultural Marxism for which radical feminism is only one avenue of attack."

Das alles ist nicht wirr, sondern als politische Positionierung ebenso bekannt wie inhaltlich falsch. Die "Tabubrüche", die mit Begriffe wie "Political Correctness" und "Gutmenschentum" Stimmung gemacht haben, führen in der Praxis zu Massenmorden wie dem im Oslo. Es ist jetzt an der Zeit mit den Leuten im eigenen Bekanntenkreis, die die Position vertreten haben, dass "Sarrazin ja irgendwie auch Recht habe", ein ernstes Wort zu reden. Es wäre gut, wenn sie sich über sich selbst erschrecken und einsehen, dass einige "Tabus" - z.b. die Unveräußerlichkeit der Menschenrechte in Frage zu stellen - ihren Sinn haben.

15:09 24.07.2011
Dieser Beitrag gibt die Meinung des Autors wieder, nicht notwendigerweise die der Redaktion des Freitag.
Geschrieben von

Andreas Kemper

Interessen: * Klassenspezifische Diskriminierung * Genderforschung * Utopien, Anarchismus * Wikipedia * Biopolitik
Schreiber 0 Leser 14
Andreas Kemper

Kommentare 217

Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Ehemaliger Nutzer | Community
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
ignaz-w | Community
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
rahab | Community
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar