Was gehen uns angebliche Menschenrechtsverletzungen in China an?

Bei diesem Beitrag handelt es sich um ein Blog aus der Freitag-Community

Es geht um die Unterscheidung von Menschenrechten als Idee und dem, wozu Menschen ihre Menschenrechte gebrauchen wollen. Freiheit an sich und zu einem selbstgesetzten Zweck. Man will was machen: (1) kann man das ueberhaupt und (2) ist es sinnvoll?

Gehen mich die Zwecke der Menschen in China etwas an? Die Zwecke der Afghanen? Der Iraner? Einige Zwecke vielleicht schon, die Go0ogle frueher weggefiltert hat und nun nicht mehr wegfiltern will. Und es gibt Zwecke der chinesischen Regierung, Zwecke der USA und meine eigenen. Es gibt Solidaritaet, aber nicht immer und nicht mit jedem. Wie soll China wachsen? Warum war China so arm?

Ein spannender Fall ist Thailand. Ein Telekommensch war Praesident gewesen und verjagd worden. Allgemeiner Beifall. Einige Zeit spaeter: Freiheit fuer die Telekommunikation? Vielleicht ist Opposition einfach telegener. Freiheit in orange oder gruen und kein wozu.

Kampf um Aufmerksamkeit:

All chief editors and managers:

Google has officially announced its withdrawal from the China market. This is a high-impact incident. It has triggered netizens' discussions which are not limited to a commercial level. Therefore please pay strict attention to the following content requirements during this period:

A. News section:

1. Only use Central Government main media (website) content; do not use content from other sources.

2. Reposting must not change title.

3. News recommendations should refer to Central government main media websites.

4. Do not produce relevant topic pages; do not set discussion sessions; do not conduct related investigative reporting.

5. Online programs with experts and scholars on this matter must apply for permission ahead of time. This type of self-initiated program production is strictly forbidden.

6. Carefully manage the commentary posts under news items.

B. Forums, blogs and other interactive media sections:

1. It is not permitted to hold discussions or investigations on the Google topic.

2. Interactive sections do not recommend this topic, do not place this topic and related comments at the top.

3. All websites please clean up text, images and sound and videos which attack the Party, State, government agencies, Internet policies with the excuse of this event.

4. All websites please clean up text, images and sound and videos which support Google, dedicate flowers to Google, ask Google to stay, cheer for Google and others have a different tune from government policy.

5. On topics related to Google, carefully manage the information in exchanges, comments and other interactive sessions.

6. Chief managers in different regions please assign specific manpower to monitor Google-related information; if there is information about mass incidents, please report it in a timely manner.

We ask the Monitoring and Control Group to immediately follow up monitoring and control actions along the above directions; once any problems are discovered, please communicate with respected sessions in a timely manner.

Addition[al] guidelines:

-- Do not participate in and report Google's information/press releases.

-- Do not report about Google exerting pressure on our country via people or events.

-- Related reports need to put [our story/perspective/information] in the center, do not provide materials for Google to attack relevant policies of our country.

-- Use talking points about Google withdrawing from China published by relevant departments.

11:57 27.03.2010
Dieser Beitrag gibt die Meinung des Autors wieder, nicht notwendigerweise die der Redaktion des Freitag.
Geschrieben von

Fritz Teich

Schlesinger hat mich wieder an Reinhold Niebuhr erinnert.
Schreiber 0 Leser 0
Fritz Teich

Kommentare